Suspended Kogi Central lawmaker, Senator Natasha Akpoti- Uduaghan
There was a brief drama at the entrance of the National Assembly complex in Abuja as security operatives barred the suspended Kogi Central lawmaker, Senator Natasha Akpoti- Uduaghan, from gaining access.
The senator arrived in company of rights advocate activist, Aisha Yesufu, as well as crowd of supporters on Tuesday.
However, they were denied access to the National Assembly premises by security operatives on duty.
Yesufu, in a bid to intervene, confronted the officers stationed at the gate and challenged the order allegedly issued to block Natasha’s entry.
She said, “National Assembly is meant to be for everyone. Why are you stopping us? We are not abiding doesn’t mean we are cowards,” she said.
Speaking to journalist, Akpoti-Uduaghan expressed dissatisfaction with the Senate leadership, after the court ruled in her favour.
In her words, “It’s about me, a duly elected senator walking into the chambers to resume my constitutional duties. I had duly notified the Senate through two letters that I would be resuming functions today, July 22nd, 2025.
“The number of armed policemen we met outside, all well-kitted with guns, charging at an unarmed female senator, was shocking. We have people here, attractive Nigerians, who witnessed this. The second thing is the fact that the Senate, under its leadership, has decided to become lawbreakers by denying my entrance into the chambers to resume my duties,” she said.
Akpoti-Uduaghan also addressed what she called a deliberate attempt to misrepresent the court’s ruling in the media.
She said, “There’s been some conversations in the media by their own team trying to twist a narrative that the judge did not order my reinstatement, and I’d like to clarify that.
“If you look at Section 318 of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution, it’s very clear that decisions of a court come in five ways: a judicial decree, a sentence, an order, a conviction, and a recommendation.”
“Mine tilted towards a recommendation, which some interpret as voluntary, meaning the Senate has the right to comply or not. But I’d like to clarify that again.
“If you go further to Section 287, Subsection 3 of the 1999 Constitution, it clearly specifies that decisions, any of these five decisions of any court, are binding on every authority.
“So, what that means in simple terms: whether Justice Binta Nyako or the Federal High Court made an order, a sentence, a judicial decree, or a recommendation, however they want to interpret the literal words, it is still a decision of a court, and it is still binding on the National Assembly.”
Refuting media reports that the Senate had appealed the judgment, Akpoti-Uduaghan held up a document and said, “The second issue I’ve seen…around the media is that the Senate appealed the judgment.
“I’m saying it clearly… this is the appeal last week against Justice Binta Nyako’s judgment. It is clear that it is not the National Assembly, neither is it the Senate. It’s Senator Akpabio himself.
“The National Assembly has not appealed that judgment. The Senate has not appealed the judgment. The Committee on Ethics, which wrongly suspended me, has not appealed the judgment.
“As a matter of fact, Senator Akpabio joined the Clerk of the National Assembly, the entire Senate, and the Chairman Committee on Ethics as joint respondents to the case.
“That means Akpabio has taken the National Assembly, the Senate, the Clerk, and the Committee to court as well.
“That must be clarified, so there is no reason whatsoever, contrary to the publications I read yesterday, that I should not resume today because the Senate has appealed.”
She vowed to pursue legal solutions to address the barring issues with security operative at the Senate Chamber .
